University of Kentucky Grants Humanist Exemption From Workplace AI
University of Kentucky administrator David Durman secured a Humanist accommodation to avoid workplace AI, extending protections to nontheistic beliefs.
Summary
As of October 30, 2026, University of Kentucky administrator David Durman is the first Humanist to secure a workplace religious accommodation allowing him to abstain from AI use, and among the first people to discuss the process publicly. Durman, who supports researchers applying for grants, is not required to use AI, but acted after colleagues and leaders recommended it, fearing advice could become a mandate. Unitarian Universalist software engineer Erin Maus, whose similar accommodation inspired Durman, faces an especially unusual position because coding without AI assistance has become rare.
Durman says Humanism grounds morality in human flourishing and the active use of the mind. In an American Humanist Association statement published that week, he argued AI weakens critical thinking, displaces livelihoods, imposes environmental costs, and supplants or takes human creativity. Association attorney Alexandria Huiskens said workplace protections can cover nontheistic beliefs, while Pope Leo XIV has separately called AI a threat to human dignity. University spokesperson Jay Blanton said Durman can perform his essential duties under the individualized accommodation, which may be reviewed as technology and job responsibilities evolve.
Positives
- David Durman became the first Humanist to secure workplace accommodations allowing abstention from AI use.
- University of Kentucky determined Durman could retain the accommodation while performing his position’s essential functions.
- Alexandria Huiskens said workplace protections can extend to Humanists and other people with nontheistic beliefs.
- Erin Maus previously secured similar protection as a Unitarian Universalist software engineer, giving Durman a model to follow.
Risks & concerns
- University of Kentucky may review Durman’s accommodation as technology and job responsibilities change.
- Durman says AI can weaken critical thinking by reducing the active application of the human mind.
- Durman argues AI displaces livelihoods, carries environmental costs, and threatens human art and literature.
- Erin Maus faces pressure in a profession where writing code without AI assistance has become rare.